Foreclosure's tax bite
Burden may soon shift to healthier
Mecklenburg neighborhoods
STELLA M. HOPKINS AND TED MELLNIK
The tax bill for Charlotte's foreclosures is coming due.
Mecklenburg County appraisers are estimating property
values for the first time since lax lending and exotic mortgages enabled
people to buy homes they could not afford. The resulting wave of foreclosures
here and nationwide has eroded property values.
The price of about one in eight Mecklenburg homes sold
in the past two years was at or below property tax values last calculated in
2002, according to an Observer analysis. Most are in high-foreclosure
neighborhoods.
Lagging sales prices mean tax values are likely to fall
in hard-hit areas. Tax dollars lost because of those lower values would have
to be made up. As a result, the latest price of the mortgage mess could be
that homeowners in healthier neighborhoods shoulder more of the tax burden.
"For everybody that goes down, somebody has to go
up if you're going to keep the level of (revenue) the same," said Guy
Griscom, president of the International Association of Assessing Officers.
"The properties that are doing well will pay more."
Nationwide, assessors are grappling with declining
values and the impact of foreclosures. Experts estimate foreclosures will cost
hundreds of millions in lost property tax dollars.
It's too early to quantify the potential tax bite of
Mecklenburg's foreclosures.
Taxpayers won't receive notices of new valuations until
early next year. Elected officials won't set tax rates using those new values
until mid-2009.
Overall, single-family Mecklenburg houses that sold in
the past two years, fetched an average of 22 percent above tax values, the
Observer found. Those increases, coupled with strong appreciation in
commercial properties, mean the overall tax base is likely to grow.
In the past, an overall gain in property values often
prompted elected officials to lower tax rates. They aim for what's called a
revenue neutral point -- a tax rate that generates about the same total amount
of money.
But the county has had nearly 11,000 foreclosures since
the last revaluation. Foreclosed houses often sell at big discounts, and that
also hurts the value of surrounding houses. Concentrations of foreclosures
have an even greater impact on values.
The Observer has previously found the densest
concentrations of foreclosures are in dozens of lower priced subdivisions
built within the last decade. Some already are suffering decay and rising
crime. Dealing with those problems costs taxpayer dollars. So will falling
values.
"We are connected," said Jennifer Roberts,
chairman of the Mecklenburg County commissioners, who will set county tax
rates. "In the end, it impacts everybody."
A shifting burden ahead
This revaluation comes amid worries about falling home
prices and sluggish sales.The Charlotte area has fared better than most
because job growth has continued drawing people and fueling home sales. The
area also didn't see explosive price growth during recent boom years and
likewise hasn't seen a sharp pullback.
By one measure, the region's homes have shown a
five-year appreciation rate of nearly 28 percent. That's similar to the
appreciation rate the Observer analysis found for Mecklenburg.
Appraisers will set property values, effective Jan. 1,
2009, for the county's 350,000 residential and business properties. Those
values are the basis of tax bills that generate much of the money to run the
county, Charlotte and surrounding towns.
Even if commissioners cut the tax rate, homeowners in
areas that have seen above-average appreciation are likely to see bigger tax
bills. On the other hand, they have been getting a tax break during years
their home values rose above the tax assessment.
"There's definitely a tax burden shifting,"
said Michael Doney, a Realtor who lives in Biddleville and sells houses in the
emerging inner-city area near uptown. "If we have a better neighborhood
for whatever reason, then I guess we pay the taxes for it."
Mecklenburg appraisers have already set values
countywide based on one measure, the cost to build properties. They won't
divulge those values because it's an interim step. Now they're comparing those
assessments with actual sales to identify differences.
Appraisers' decisions are not driven by tax revenue
needs. Their goal is to set tax values that closely approximate market values
-- what a property would sell for as of the effective date. That's always a
tricky task, made even tougher in a rocky market.
The appraisers will evaluate sales from all of last year
and much of this year. That means they will be using a period of declining
sales, slowing construction and weaker pricing. The Observer analyzed nearly
31,000 sales from the past two years, including 2006, a record setter locally.
So the city's valuations could be bleaker than those identified by the
newspaper.
The Observer analysis doesn't duplicate the full
appraisal process, but it is an early indicator of how market values are
shaping up and where taxes might rise and fall. Chuck Hicks, the county
appraiser heading the revaluation team, said he expects to see a pattern of
values similar to what the Observer found.
Perennial performers such as south Charlotte did well.
The light-rail corridor is heating up farther south of uptown than before.
Cozy older neighborhoods such as Dilworth and Plaza
Midwood were among big gainers. The pace of appreciation picked up in other
inner city areas, such as Biddleville and Villa Heights, that were emerging in
the last revaluation.
"We have neighborhoods where the sales are
hot," Hicks said. "We're trying to figure out how we're going to get
to the values."
But sales lag tax values in a swath of homes, starting
around Interstate 85 west of downtown, arching northward to Independence
Boulevard on the eastside . That's also the county's foreclosure zone.
The swath is home to the bulk of houses that have sold
for less than tax value or shown modest gains of 10 percent or less.
"This is the first time that this has been a real
factor in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg market," Hicks said of the
foreclosure surge.
Some sales below tax value
Cynthia Yeldell's 2003 property value notice held a
happy surprise: The tax value of her new house was nearly $10,000 more than
what she paid a few months earlier.
Then came the foreclosures, and the renters who didn't
tend their homes along Braveheart Lane in northwest Charlotte's Oakdale
Village. Yeldell says she has heard gunshots. The community of 73 houses,
built several years ago, has had at least 28 foreclosures, nearly 40 percent,
according to county records.
Houses that sell, regularly fetch prices below tax value
and their initial sales prices.
One, which had not been a foreclosure, sold in January
for 25 percent less than its original price. A foreclosure sold in February
for 45 percent less.
Seven Braveheart houses listed for sale are priced below
their 2003 tax value, one by 30 percent. Six of those also are listed at less
than their original sales prices just a few years ago.
Oakdale Village is part of the Brookshire Boulevard
corridor running northwest from uptown. Hicks says that at this early stage,
appraisers have noticed weaker values in the region. The road, also called
N.C. 16, dissects a wedge of high-foreclosure neighborhoods west of I-77.
The Oakdale Village subdivision is a smaller area than
appraisers use to set values. However, its neighbors include other
high-foreclosure areas.
"I love my house, but the surroundings could be
better," said Yeldell, who works at a nearby distribution center. "I
wish I could afford better, but I can't, therefore I'm stuck here."
Foreclosures elsewhere
In California's pricey Monterey County, home to actor
Clint Eastwood's multimillion-dollar properties, the tax assessor last year
lowered values an average of 10 percent on about 800 homes. This year, he
expects to cut values on as many as 7,500 houses, about 10 percent of the
county's houses."We've never seen this sort of decline," said Steve
Vagnini, the assessor.
Monterey, like other parts of California, is suffering
both high foreclosures and a steep plunge in housing prices that exploded
within the last few years. Foreclosures are the dominant issue for
Mecklenburg.
Assessors generally aren't supposed to consider
foreclosures when setting property values because those are forced sales, not
market sales. The Observer analysis also used market sales data, as provided
by the county.
Hicks and others say appraisers pick up the impact of
foreclosures because they depress the selling price of nearby homes. But some
say there's a tipping point at which foreclosures themselves must be factored
into valuations.
Guy Griscom, the president of the assessors group, is a
43-year industry veteran and assistant chief appraiser for the Texas county
that includes Houston. This year, he expects to reduce values for about 11
percent of homes, mostly in the $80,000 to $150,000 range and hard hit by
foreclosures.
"The foreclosures have become the market,"
said Griscom, who heads the county appraisal department. "That's what's
driving these reductions."
The foreclosure-driven devaluation is a first for the
county, and officials haven't yet tallied the lost tax revenues, but they
will, Griscom said. He didn't know of a municipality that had yet made that
calculation but said he expects many soon will.
Mecklenburg appraisers say they're evaluating the impact
of foreclosures.
"If it becomes something that absolutely begs to be
considered, then we will do so," said Eric Anderson, the county's
assistant assessor.
